Day 235: Central United States Cold Front

AUTHOR’S NOTE: Please be sure to check out the comments below. Dr. Kim Elmore (NSSL) offers a more specific explanation as to why the cold front appears in the water vapor imagery.

Well, it’s the start of another academic school year, which means my favorite meteorology class is once again back in session — Synoptic Meteorology. Although I’m not a TA for the course this year, I will once again be helping where and when I can. I also hope to use this blog to supplement the lecture materials by having my nightly post tie into whatever was discussed in class that day. (We’ll see how long this lasts…)

Today we had several brave students get up and do a spot map discussion. (The students did very well for the first day. This bodes well for the rest of the semester!) One of the maps we had the students discuss was today’s water vapor imagery. While the students were discussing the large dry region over much of the eastern US apparent in the water vapor imagery, I noticed something interesting in the high plains near the Rocky Mountains. If one examines a loop of today’s water vapor imagery, it is possible to watch the progression of a surface cold front as it surges south. Although water vapor imagery tends to depict moisture in what meteorologists refer to as the “mid and upper troposphere”, it can actually “see” very near the ground in regions of high elevation (such as mountains and the high plains). This is because in these locations the ground is actually near the bottom of what we consider the mid troposphere (700mb or so).

The cold front shows up in water vapor imagery as a thin, dark, curved line extending southward along the ridge of the Rocky Mountains and then curves east and then northeastward as it extends out over the lower plains. The satellite is detecting the density gradient along the leading edge of the cold front. (Remember, cold air is more dense than warm air!) The satellite is most likely detecting the subsidence portion of the mesoscale circulations within the frontal zone. The reason for the “surge” southward nearer the peaks of the Rocky Mountains can be attributed to the location of the surface high pressure (not shown). As the surface high pressure moves southeastward out of western Canada, the circulation around the high pressure results in a northeast surface wind to the southeast of the center of the high pressure.

This northeast wind advects the “cold” air behind the font into the Rocky Mountains. As the cold air piles up along the Rocky Mountains one of two things has to happen in order to conserve mass: 1) the cold air can flow over the Rocky Mountains, or 2) the air must spread out horizontally along the front range. Since cold air is dense (heavy) it is very hard to lift this air over the Rocky Mountains, which means the air tends to spread out along the eastern slopes of the Rocky Mountains. Because of the north-to-south component of the surface wind, the cold air does not spread out equally to the north and south. it predominantly moves south. Thus, the cold front surges southward faster the closer to the peaks of the Rocky Mountains. (In actuality, the fastest surge occurs just east of the Rocky Mountain peaks due to frictional effects of the mountains…)

Below is a series of water vapor images in sets of two. The top most image has no annotation whereas the bottom image has the hand-drawn location of the surface cold front. Notice in the last few images higher moisture is detected by the satellite. This is because thunderstorms developed in response to the surface convergence along the advancing cold front. Also, in the first few images, a second cold front is detected to the north of the primary cold front. This cold front appears to dissipate as the day progresses, most likely the result of daytime heating weakening the temperature/density gradient along this secondary front.

Water Vapor Imagery Valid 1215 UTC (7:15 AM CDT)
Day 235 (a)
Day 235 (b)

Water Vapor Imagery Valid 1515 UTC (10:15 AM CDT)
Day 235 (c)
Day 235 (d)

Water Vapor Imagery Valid 1815 UTC (1:15 PM CDT)
Day 235 (e)
Day 235 (f)

Water Vapor Imagery Valid 2115 UTC (4:15 PM CDT)
Day 235 (g)
Day 235 (h)

Water Vapor Imagery Valid 0015 UTC (7:15 PM CDT)
Day 235 (i)
Day 235 (j)

  • http://www.nssl.noaa.gov/users/elmore/public_html/ Kim Elmore

    Beautiful depction! As I consider myself a perpetual student, I went you your blog to read what you had to say. Your discussion is good, but I must take issue with your explanation of why we see these boundaries in the water vapor imagery.

    Water vapor imagery comes from channel 3 in the GOES I-M scanning radiometer and that channel is centered somewhere between 6 and 7 microns in wavelength. These wavelengths are where water vapor is most absorptive and so where it can obscure radiation from earth’s surface. So, white areas are where less radiation reaches the radiometer and dark areas are where more radiation reaches the radiometer. Thus, white areas are where there is more water vapor mass in the vertical column and dark areas are where there is less.

    Water vapor imagery results from imhomogeneities within the vertical distribution of water vapor in the mid-troposphere. These inhomogeneities come about through horizontal advection, vertical motions, and horizontal deformation. In your explanation, you say that what we see is due to a density gradient, but I don’t see how that can be. Since the areas associated with the front are darker, more radiation is making it through the vertical column, which means there is less vertically integrated water vapor mass. I think what we see depicts something about mesoscale circulations set up by the boundaries you note. I’ll guess that we’re seeing subsidence and possibly frontolytic deformation (post passage) associated with these propagating boundaries.

    As to why the secondary boundary dissipates, your hypothesis is as good as any I’ve heard.

  • http://www.atm.helsinki.fi/~dschultz David Schultz

    Hi Patrick,

    Nice discussion. There was an interesting paper published about ten years ago discussing the water vapor bands above surface cold fronts over the central Plains (Ralph 1999). I have seen this several times, as well, so this observation of water vapor bands in the upper-troposphere indicating the signature of deeply forced waves from the surface colds seems to happen from time to time. Furthermore, in the MM5 simulation that Paul Roebber and I published of the Sanders (1955) cold front, we noticed the same thing, although those cross sections I made from that case remain unpublished. Maybe someday I will get to this.

    By the way, the AMS monograph in tribute to Fred Sanders should be required reading by all synoptic meteorologists. I have contributed to two chapters in there (so my advice is not unbiased), although I am even more impressed by the other authors’ contributions. The book is quite a thorough and thick tribute to one of the greatest research meteorologists that I have known.

    Ralph, F. M., P. J. Neiman, T. L. Keller, 1999: Deep-Tropospheric Gravity Waves Created by Leeside Cold Fronts. J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 2986–3009.

    Schultz, D. M., and P. J. Roebber, 2008: The fiftieth anniversary of Sanders (1955): A mesoscale-model simulation of the cold front of 17-18 April 1953. Synoptic-Dynamic Meteorology and Weather Analysis and Forecasting: A Tribute to Fred Sanders, Meteor. Monogr., No. 55, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 126-143.

  • http://www.atm.helsinki.fi/~dschultz David Schultz

    One other thing. You say, “Since cold air is dense (heavy) it is very hard to lift this air over the Rocky Mountains, which means the air tends to spread out along the eastern slopes of the Rocky Mountains.”

    I think it makes more sense to discuss the cold air not ascending the Rockies because it is stable, not because it is cold.

  • http://www.patricktmarsh.com pmarsh

    You are absolutely correct. I originally had not thought of it in that way, but approaching this in terms of stability, not temperature, is the better approach. Thanks for the comment!